AL GORE–NOT DOING HIS JOB IN PROMOTING THE USE OF ELECTRIC CARS!

August 6, 2017

I keep seeing all the bruhaha over Al Gore’s electric usage. 34% more than the average American household? Gee Al, how do you ever expect to make all these electric cars popular if you are only using 34% more than the average?

Well, being the electricity hog family that we are, it is just common sense that when you have a big house and are NOT really very energy-saving conscientious, your electric bill is going to be way higher than the average ranger. Now, we are just little peons in the wash cycle, but we do our share to keep our Electric company in the black. I suppose if we stood on our soapbox and screamed, “GLOBAL WARMING–We are all going to die if we don’t stop burning coal to make electricity.” (well our electricity comes from a hydro plant) then I would be considered a HUGE HYPOCRITE!

We are just a pod on the bean poll, but this is what I receive every few months from our electric company…personally, instead of guilting our family for using so much electricity, they should be sending us a gift certificate for dinner, to Panera perhaps for being such good and loyal customers.

GO AL GORE, KEEP THOSE ELECTRIC COMPANIES ROLLING IN THE PROFITS AND START DOING A BETTER JOB OF PROMOTING ELECTRICITY…34% THAT IS PATHETIC! YOU CAN CERTAINLY DO BETTER!   THE TESLA CORP IS DEPENDING ON YOU!

We are certainly doing our part…

 

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and the featured writer.

 

 

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

Can’t See the Smoke Stacks for the smog. All-Electric House BAD! All Electric cars, GOOD!

December 27, 2018

 People get sold a bill of goods all the time. And with so much propaganda and misinformation spewed by companies like Google and the Obama era EPA, and the myriad of companies receiving government subsidies, it is difficult to sort through all the BS to find the truth. But so many times the truth is so common sense that it is like searching for something that is standing in clear sight but can’t be seen. And it is not that we are blind to it, it is just many simply don’t want to see it!

Sure, electric cars may save you money to drive and our government will give you a hefty kickback to purchase one, and you truly feel in your heart that you are producing 0% emissions tooling around in your automobile–talking the moral high ground so to speak…but are you really saving the planet? Have you ever wondered why ALL ELECTRIC houses are so expensive to heat and cool and people switch to natural gas because it is more efficient and much cheaper than electricity and better for the environment? We have all seen the pictures of the GIGANTIC smokestacks that produce the majority of our electricity as 63% of our electricity is generated from fossil fuels–coal, natural gas, petroleum…and yet, so many are duped into thinking what’s bad for the dwelling is better for the driver. Then there are the batteries! The Energizer Bunny doesn’t just appear with a trunkload of batteries! Lithium must be mined and in great quantities to supply enough batteries to maintain and store all that energy that moves those “clean” “Green” cars. Talk about Raping the land!

A few years back, our local electric company would send me a guilt letter showing that our house used 10 times more electricity than our neighbors. It came with a graph and many options for us to cut back our electricity usage. It really was a dunning letter of sorts telling us that we were electricity hogs and that we should cut back! I called them and explained that the next letter of this nature better come with a customer appreciation gift card to our favorite restaurant as our COMFORT BILLING was almost $500 every month! “WE ARE PAYING TO KEEP YOUR LIGHTS ON THERE AT THE PLANT!” “Conserve, conserve…” was the sentiment of the gal on the other end of the line. So, it seems that ideology isn’t making its way to the Electric Car Industry, no, quite the contrary; the entire world is pushing the use of electric vehicles! Buy, buy, buy, and use more electricity and mine more lithium, is the Liberal, Environmental battle cry to save the planet. Does anyone but me see a blatant contradiction here? “Electric heating bad…Natural gas, good!”  “FOSSIL FUELS BAD…ELECTRICITY GOOD!”

“If you believe the headlines, traditional automobiles are speeding toward a dead end. All those V8s, V6s and turbocharged vehicles we’ve grown to love will soon be replaced by squadrons of clean, whisper-quiet, all-electric vehicles. And if you believe the headlines, the environment will be much better off.

Policymakers at every level have done their part to push electric vehicles by creating a tankful of subsidies. Thanks to laws signed by both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, electric-vehicle buyers can feast on federal tax credits of up to $7,500 that reduce the initial purchase cost of their vehicles. Not to be outdone, many states also dangle their own mix of goodies for electric vehicle buyers, including purchase rebates as large as $5,000, additional rebates for vehicle chargers, and free use of public charging stations—which, of course, are only “free” because they’re subsidized by ratepayers and taxpayers. Some states even give electric vehicles preferential access to carpool lanes.

 Then there are the electric vehicle mandates. In January, California Gov. Jerry Brown decreed that 5 million electric vehicles must be on his state’s roads by 2025, along with 250,000 charging stations. Eight other states are followingCalifornia’s lead. One California lawmaker has even introduced legislation to banall internal combustion vehicles by 2040.

All of this might make sense if electric vehicles, as their supporters claim, were truly likely to reduce air pollution and tackle climate change. But are they?

To answer that question, I used the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s most recent long-term forecasts for the number of new electric vehicles through 2050, estimated how much electricity they’d use, and then figured out how much pollution that electricity would generate, looking at three key pollutants regulated under the U.S. Clean Air Act—sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and particulates—as well as CO2 emissions. I compared them to the emissions of new gasoline-powered vehicles, using the EIA’s “real world” miles-per-gallon forecast, rather than the higher CAFE standard values.

What I found is the widespread adoption of electric vehicles nationwide will likely increase air pollution compared with new internal combustion vehicles. You read that right: more electric cars and trucks will mean more pollution.

That might sound counterintuitive: After all, won’t replacing a 30-year old, smoke-belching Oldsmobile with a new electric vehicle reduce air pollution? Yes, of course. But that’s also where many electric vehicle proponents’ arguments run off the road: they fail to consider just how clean and efficient new internal combustion vehicles are. The appropriate comparison for evaluating the benefits of all those electric vehicle subsidies and mandates isn’t the difference between an electric vehicle and an old gas-guzzler; it’s the difference between an electric car and a new gas car. And new internal combustion engines are really clean. Today’s vehicles emit only about 1% of the pollution than they did in the 1960s, and new innovations continue to improve those engines’ efficiency and cleanliness.

And as for that electric car: The energy doesn’t come from nowhere. Cars are charged from the nation’s electrical grid, which means that they’re only as “clean” as America’s mix of power sources. Those are getting cleaner, but we still generate power mainly by burning fossil fuels: natural gas is our biggest source of electricity and is projected to increase. And coal, while still declining, will remain the second-largest source of electricity for some time. (Third is nuclear power, which doesn’t generate emissions but has other byproducts that worry some environmentalists.) Even with large increases in wind and solar generation, the EIA projects that the nation’s electric generating mix will be just 30% renewable by 2030. Based on that forecast, if the EIA’s projected number of electric vehicles were replaced with new internal combustion vehicles, air pollution would actually decrease—and this holds true even if you include the emissions from oil refineries that manufacture gasoline.

As for states like California with stringent mandates to use more renewable energy for their power grid, they also have the highest electric rates in the continental US, 50% higher than the US average. And electric rates in those states just keep increasing. So it’s a cleaner power mix but makes recharging your car more expensive. The higher the electric rate, the lower the incentive for a new car buyer to purchase an electric vehicle.

As for greenhouse-gas emissions, my analysis shows that electric vehicles will reduce them compared to new internal combustion vehicles. But based on the EIA’s projection of the number of new electric vehicles, the net reduction in CO2emissions between 2018 and 2050 would be only about one-half of one percent of total forecast U.S. energy-related carbon emissions. Such a small change will have no impact whatsoever on climate and thus have no economic benefit.

So, if electric-vehicle subsidies don’t help the environment, what—or who—do they help? Most electric-vehicle buyers are far wealthier than average Americans. A nationwide survey in 2017 found that 56% had household incomes of at least $100,000 and 17% had household incomes of at least $200,000. (In 2016, median household income for the US as a whole was less than $58,000.) So it’s fair to say the subsidies disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of the poor, who cannot afford to buy even subsidized electric vehicles or live in their own homes to take advantage of residential chargers or solar panels.

Not only that, the wires and charging stations needed to charge all those electric vehicles will be paid for by all ratepayers, further raising electric rates. And as more wealthy customers install solar panels to charge their electric vehicles, the costs to provide the back-up power will fall on those who cannot afford to do so.

In effect, the wealthy owners of electric vehicles will enjoy the benefits of their clean, silent cars, while passing on many of the costs of keeping their vehicles on the road to everyone else, especially the poor.

To be sure, electric cars are impressive. Some are quickeroff the line than a Formula 1 race car. But there is no economic or environmental justification for the many billions of dollars in subsidies that America is already paying to speed their adoption.

So what to do? First, Congress should immediately terminate those electric-vehicle tax credits, which just benefit the wealthy. Congress should also eliminate zero-emissions credits, which electric-vehicle manufacturers have used to boost their bottom line – $860 million for Tesla alone in the last three years. And third, states should eliminate their various subsidies for electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, which are also paid for disproportionately by the poor and are contributing to rising electric rates.

Electric vehicle subsidies and mandates share an unfortunate and all too common trait with other government policies: They’re based on “conventional wisdom” that turns out to be wrong. Wealthy consumers who have purchased Teslas and Chevy Bolts primarily to signal their green bona fides for their friends and neighbors, and who have socialized many of the costs of their purchases to those who are less well-off, might wish to take a closer look at the numbers. Their hands may not be quite so clean as they believe.” John Lessor, President of Continental Economics

 

 

 

Daniella Cross is the caretaker of 4Earth and featured writer.

 

 

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

 

 

COCONUT OIL EXPOSES POLITICAL AGENDAS!

June 21, 2017

 

 

So, I was reading about the Trending Food Fad of Coconut oil. Evidently, the Heart Association didn’t have some kind words to say about this “miracle” food and Diana Rogers, a certified nutritionist who speaks at universities and conferences internationally about nutrition and sustainability, social justice, animal welfare, and food policy issues, has a huge issue with what the Heart Assoc. had to say. In her Blog, “Sustainable Dish” she rebutted with all her knowledge, experience, and wisdom.

It was the first sentence that caused me to read further: “You may have seen the news late last week about the latest “Presidential Advisory” on dietary fats released from the American Heart Association (AHA) published online in Circulation. ” Now, as a writer, I sometimes put QUOTES around a word that I want to bring special attention to and in this case–“Presidential Advisory”. The use of these quotes showed me her political stance. But what really spurred me on were these sentences, and this has more to do with EVERYTHING than just Coconut oil!

“Additionally, as with any non-profit organization, the AHA needs money. The best place to get money is from corporate sponsors…”

• “It’s not a surprise the AHA was able to spin the current research to match their overall message.

• “Funding for research is provided by government organizations or corporations. This influences the type of research that is funded and the types of findings that come out of research as a result.

“The Irony here, is that the Liberal community has no problem crying, “foul” and pointing their finger at Government or Corporate manipulation in skewing the facts to meet their agenda when it comes to something as TRIVIAL as Coconut oil, but gorge on the scale tipping, snake oil when it comes to issues like Global warming, abortion, evolution etc. They will follow the money trail only when it leads to their pot of Lucky Charms.

I am not saying that I disagree with what Ms. Rogers has to say…I agree with her 100%!

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Caretaker of 4EARTH and featured writer.

 

 

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

 

DEATH BY NUMBERS!

September 6, 2018

The period of time in and around WWll was so devastating in terms of lives lost. Many of us Americans, especially younger people have little to no understanding of the magnitude of deaths that occurred in Communist and Socialist countries during that time period. https://youtu.be/7cgRwDkP6vk  VIDEO HERE

When we look at our own political climate, it becomes soberly clear that history has been forgotten and we are now tossed by the waves of ignorance…our children are violently screaming in the streets, begging for a political system that will ultimately destroy them; they see good as evil and evil as good and in their own ignorance they rally to; “JUST DO IT!” Nothing is more destructive to a Nation than a population that is ignorant and led by a corrupt, controlled media.

Teachers, I implore you to TEACH! Do NOT focus on “WHY” someone has a right to, for instance, kneel, instead start teaching history, start focusing on TRUTH, not personal feelings. In doing so our children will learn and understand, without any coercion or misconceptions the entire story, not simply bits and pieces used to blur their focus. It is not about your RIGHT to do something, it is about; are you RIght in what you do?

 

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Keeper of 4Earth and the featured Writer

 

 

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

DEERFIELD, IL IS A SAFER PLACE NOW! WE HAVE YOUR GUNS!

April 4, 2018

And so it begins! Those who have registered guns, those who have concealed carry permits will be the first targeted! It will be interesting to see how the “village” of Deerfield carries out this ban. “Rulemakers in the village of Deerfield, Illinois, have voted unanimously to ban semi-automatic rifles, along with pistols and shotguns “with certain features,” as well as with magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.” So, allow me to digress for a moment and point out something that piqued my spidey senses. The term, “village” used by the media and lawmakers in this, um, place. Words mean things and conger up ideas in one’s mind, like the term “village”. Sounds small, quaint and a by the technical term; Village – a village is a human settlement or community that is larger than a hamlet but, smaller than a town. A “human settlement”, well, ok. What criteria determines a human settlement a town? Large town – a large town has a population of 20,000 to 100,000. Town – a town has a population of 1,000 to 20,000. So, does Deerfield, IL fit into that commune type, everyone agrees and works together type of settlement? Deerfield, IL has a population of 18,686 and is the 2,338th largest city in the United States. The population density is 3,381 per sq mi which is 1421% higher than the Illinois average and 3632% higher than the national average. Well, that settles that, Deerfield is verging on a large town and well within the criteria of a town. But, even though…it is a village. Ok, call it a village…

I also wanted to know a little more about this quaint little village, like what kind of people live there? Are they average, middle-class Americans? First things first, let’s look at the average price of a home in Deerfield. Mean prices in 2016: All housing units: $595,599; Detached houses: $620,710. Holy WOW! That’s not the high-end homes, THAT’S THE AVERAGE COST! Ok, so we have a lot of wealthy people crammed into a very small space. What else is this town all about? The average income is $135,754. The vast majority all are college-educated and predominately white. Ok, now I have a better understanding of what makes up this community. Back to the realities at hand.

We have a Town, I mean Village that has approved a ban on certain weapons and if not removed, handed in or disposed of, the owner of such weapon will face a daily fine: “The new ordinance takes effect June 13. Residents who still have banned weapons after that date face up to $1,000 fines per day. The new ordinance was modeled on a ban put in place in Highland Park, Illinois, which went to the United States Supreme Court. The high court let a lower court ruling allowing the ban stand.”If Highland Park, if Deerfield, if more towns say no to this type of weapon, maybe the state of Illinois says no,” said Deerfield Village Manager Kent Street. “Maybe the federal government says no.”

One Deerfield resident, Dan Cox shared his reaction to the new gun ban stating, “You are the bureaucrats that Thomas Jefferson warned us about!” Another concerned citizen said, “The ordinance to store firearms was only passed for one reason… That was to have an amendatory vehicle that could be used in the future for just this purpose so you could banish assorted firearms in the future. First, it’s going to be assault rifles. [There will be] new bans in the future. It’s just a matter of time.” But wait for it, here it is, a high school student speaking out. “This is our fight. This is our generation’s fight, and we’re going to keep fighting,” Deerfield High School student Ariella Kharasch said at a public hearing, “Thank you for being part of that.” One reporter stated; “Local elected officials and high school students praised trustees for moving forward with the ban.” Notice here, two things, first we all know that even local government officials are elected, but it was important for a reporter to use the word, “elected” and secondly the praise comes from high school students…not one mention of citizens of Deerfield. Ahh, but the video below shows all the citizens of Deerfield are for this ban, or does it?

What do some of the citizens say about this ban, that was not put to a vote by the people, but passed by the Democrats on the demands of high school students and the progressive left? Obviously, Deerfield is Democrat-run and by definition, the people did vote those into office that ultimately made this decision, but as the case generally is, not everyone is happy about it.

Mitchell Shore said he is a state-certified law enforcement instructor who has trained more than 1,000 police in the use of the AR-15. He argued that there are plenty of gun laws on the books already, but they just need to be enforced more effectively. “Now that I’m retired, if you pass this ordinance I am now a criminal in the village’s eyes,” he said. “My over 20 years of law enforcement service mean nothing, and now I have to move or stay and break the law.” Some local gun owners spoke in opposition to the proposal. Daniel Easterday said he would be forced to cancel a $70,000 addition to his house and move again, having already moved out of Highland Park to avoid its weapon ban.

Watch the meeting here.  https://youtu.be/ZNfDE69UDr4

Now the speeches from the kids were very impassioned, however, not one addressed all the other factors that those who opposed this ban addressed, well, except for the last female student who admitted that “car accidents kill far more kids than guns.” These students nor the pro-grabbers mentioned the violence in video games, mental health issues in recent shooters, or the HUGE issue of bullying in school and the astronomical rate of school-age suicides due to this. Not mentioned by the leftists at this meeting or the kids who spoke was the fact that Nic Cruz was bullied, on medication to control his behavior and had been know as a public risk by many law enforcement agencies, school administrators, and students. These major issues were only mentioned by those who oppose this ban. Perhaps it is because these people actually WANT to address the real issues behind these violent acts. Unfortunately, it has taken gun bans for Conservatives to start to really become vocal about mental health issues, medicating children with adult drugs, bullying, etc. Maybe if we had yelled louder, or had our children marching on crusades against ANY of these issues that have been affecting them for years, then maybe, we wouldn’t be seen as the murderous NRA that the left coins us. We can’t keep saying–“guns don’t kill…people do”, because the Left doesn’t understand that. We must blame it on something other than people. So let’s start with Psychotropic drugs, and bullies (as long as we don’t put a face to a bully we should be fine).

So, this brings me to the main reason why I wanted to write this to you, today. It is a question, actually a series of questions pertaining to the gun ban in Deerfield, IL. Firstly, how will the “elected” local government enforce this ban? Secondly, how will law enforcement know who is in possession of these weapons, and lastly, will those who disobey this law have their guns confiscated along with the hefty daily fines–and if so, how will they go about that? These were the first questions that came to my mind when I read about this gun ban in Deerfield, IL.

Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and featured writer

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

 

 

 

 

Dying to EAT!

May 6, 2017

I have had this conversation many times… There have been very few countries in this world, throughout history, where the poorest of the communities are the most overweight. Naura, for example, a tiny South Pacific Island with a population of 13 thousand, tops the charts as the most obese population at 94% chubbies, then comes Micronesia, the Cook Islands, Niue and finally Tonga rounding out the five top portly populations. The US hits the scales at number 9 of all the counties and number 1 in the industrialized nations on the world’s obesity scale. I have been chastised for suggesting that Food Handouts from the government be regulated, generally with the comment; “who are you to tell people what they can and can not eat?” And when I say, “I just care if people are OBESE!” Oh, Good Lord, that’s just a politically incorrect thing to say. But it’s time that we begin to address this HUGE issue with some intellectual honesty.

Well, it is quite obvious that our country is a leader in worldwide obesity and it is the most prevalent in those receiving “free food” due to financial inabilities. But why has it been a trending fact that these individuals become overweight while on the free food program? John Miltmore, writer for The Intellectual Takeout blog has this to say; “It’s a stunning shift in how we understand malnourishment. For almost the entirety of human history, the struggle for impoverished people was getting enough food to meet asufficient daily caloric intake. Today, the opposite is true: Low-income people are taking in too many calories (and often bad calories, at that) and are much more likely to be overweight than people in the middle and upper classes.” http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/blog/us-has-fattest-poor-people-world-why) And it is not just this person’s blog that agrees with the connection between low-income people being obese, A 2010 study from Duke University proved this as did the Center for Disease Control.  Is this correlation simply because low-income people do not have the intellect to purchase more healthful foods?  Is it because chips, cookies, and soda taste yummy?  OR, could it be that it is cheaper to buy heavy calorie-laden foods than it is to buy fresh vegetables and lean meats?  And, considering so many fast food joints, pizza franchises and convenience stores are now accepting welfare money, making a bad food choice is so much easier now than ever before.  Come on, a full meal deal, loaded with more than the average daily calories can be consumed for less than $5 bucks!  So, do I think that most welfare recipients use the free food money they receive frivolously?   Yes AND No!  I believe that when folks are trying to stretch a buck, they will gravitate towards food items that are less expensive, which usually mean junk food/fast food, and sugar and fat are actually addictive to many bodies…the more you consume, the more you crave it.  It is rare when I hear someone say, “I need more carrots and broccoli…I just can’t get enough of them!”  Doritos on the other hand…

My solution is quite simple…just like the WIC (woman, infants & children) program regulates the amount and types of free food a woman receives for her child(ren), in the same manner, the food stamp program should be  regulated. With the WIC program, there is no monetary value put on the items you can buy, just a list of approved nutritional food: Milk, Cheese, Bread, Eggs, Peanut butter, vegetables… Sure, these women must bust out their paper stamps to claim their items, and there is a bit of social shaming that goes with that concept, not to mention holding up lines, but it works! You can’t buy Cheetos, cookies, ice cream, etc on WIC, and no one seems to have an issue with this, because that is just how it is and those are the rules to receive FREE food for you and your child. And there was a time in the not so gone by past that food stamps were not cleverly disguised as plastic debit looking cards, even the new name, EBT sounds better than, food stamps. It seems quite obvious by this point, that the current way of distributing money for food is just NOT WORKING as planned. When 1 in every 3 children are overweight and 1 in 6 are considered obese, and the majority of these statistics are from low-income families who receive Welfare in the form of food; the system needs to change. If the entire point of the Welfare food program is to enable people to obtain nutritional food, why isn’t that being enforced? One would think that low-income people do not have high-end smartphones but the vast majority do. An app could be created that could easily scan the item to see if it qualifies under the NUTRITIONAL guidelines that a Welfare recipient should have to follow. This regulation works well for the WIC program, why not the Welfare Food program? Not only would this reduce Government fed obesity, but it would also thin out Welfare fraud. After all, no one is really chomping at the bit to steal or trade fruits and veggies on the black market, no they want premium food, like Porterhouse and Lobster, that’s where the money is!

If we truly want to get America healthy again, especially those on Welfare food who have found themselves tipping the scales as a result of consuming unhealthy items, then let’s do it. The problem must be addressed, and an easy solution formulated. If WIC can do it, so can the Welfare Food program.

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and the featured writer.

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

Fascism Reinvented…New Meanings to Old Words!

March 26, 2017

 

I wonder when the liberal left is going to stop calling Trump a Fascist. Do they really think that they can keep saying a lie long enough and people will eventually believe it? While actually proving their true identity, albeit behind black masks, that indeed, it is THEM who are the Fascists! They are the ones who want to silence free speech, cause violence, and are being paid well to do it! This is the true face of Fascism folks. It is pretty scary to see that the real ideology of fascism has been expunged from most web searches and replaced with Liberal Language. Words like, “Nationalism, patriotism, flag flying, increased government military” have replaced the core ideologies of Fascism which are, “silencing speech, fake propaganda, the government dictates how businesses can be run, and violent ‘protests’ to achieve a goal.” When we think of the term Fascism images of Hitler and Mussolini come to mind. But, in reality, these men were Dictators! “Fascism just means any regime that resembles Mussolini’s, Hitler wasn’t strictly fascist, he’s just called such for convenience. A Fascism regime usually has to meet 5 criteria -exalts nation and sometimes race above the individual, -uses violence and modern techniques of propaganda and censorship to forcibly suppress political opposition, -engages in severe economic and social regimentation. -engages in corporatism -implements or is a totalitarian regime.”

We see these very things in not so subtle ways within the Liberal party. The ideology is the same, just the words are different. They exalt humanism, not nationalism, to a Liberal, Humanism IS Nationalism. We have clearly seen their very organized acts of violence as well as their powerfully, provocative propaganda via any social media outlet available. Since the recent election and even prior, the Liberals demand to censor and forcibly (violently) suppress those who disagree with their ideologies has been captured over and over by anyone holding a cell phone. With the advent of Black lives Matter, the feminazi and the transgender movement, as well as the anti-police agenda the Liberals are fulfilling the “severe economic and social regimentation.” Corporatism? Well, the average person has no idea what this really means–they think it is all about the government being in bed with big corporations and to some small degree that is true. However, it has a much clearer meaning: Corporatism- the control of a state or organization by large interest groups. We see this particular “control” by large interest groups running rampant within the Liberal party. Corporatism is a Liberal Ideology and far from Capitalism. “Capitalism is an economic system that recognizes individual rights while corporatism is a political and economic system that seeks social justice and equality among individuals.” Although we are taught that Corporatism is a right-wing system, created by those greedy conservatives fascists …but in reality, it is a SOCIALIST scheme to keep rule over the majority to fulfill the desires of a few.

When one uses catchphrases to describe Fascism, like Nationalism, Patriotism and a Strong Military, they are not describing fascism at all. That is descriptive of a united country, a nation of people who love their country and want it to be strong and unified.

When we see a large group of organized people, trying to suppress free speech, organizing violent protests to cause harm and instill fear in those that disagree with them…who use hate speech and fear-mongering, who desperately want the government to dictate how businesses are run, people who want to divide the races and cause chaos…when you see those people, you see the roots of Fascism growing. Remember, Hitler didn’t want capitalism, he didn’t want free enterprise and only wanted unity and loyalty to himself, to his agenda. He divided the people by race, he indoctrinated the children, his protesters (the ones for him) disseminated provocative propaganda, caused mass violence towards those who disagreed with him. Do you see any familiarities here? Take a good look at the Liberal Left and you will see how Hitler used his power. The Liberal Left in the United States is trying that same approach.

 

 

 

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and the featured writer.

 

 

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

 

 

 

 

Free Range Babies VS Government Raised Babies

March 25, 2017

(Photo credit Kaiser Family Foundation)

I came across an interesting article today (CNSnews.com) regarding the number of babies born in the US on Medicaid.  The headline read: “In 24 States, 50% or More of Babies Born on Medicaid; New Mexico Leads Nation With 72%”  The numbers were staggering, so my first impression, which I believe is propagating at a very high rate, is that this article MUST be fake news put out by the conservatives to push an agenda.  So I took to google to see how varied these statistics were.  The second page I hit was the Kaiser Family Foundation.  They had interactive maps and a percentage bar and showed the same statistics.  So, to make this totally legit, I ventured to the CDC.gov site.  They also had a nice fancy pie chart.  The data on the government site was slightly outdated, by 17 YEARS, but showed that among the 33 states involved in collecting this data, 44.9% of babies were born on the taxpayer’s tab. 

 

(Photo courtesy of the CDC)

According to the Census Bureau’s decennial census, the U.S. population is growing by approximately 3.3 million per year.  That being said, we can extrapolate that the above, more current percentages are well within the parameters of accurate.  The highest number of government born babies goes to New Mexico with a whopping 72% and the lowest goes to New Hampshire at 27%.  Coming in at a very close second is, of all places, Utah; a mere 31% of all babies born, are welfare babies.  That statistic kinda shocked me a bit…why?  Because I suppose of the blatantly obvious!  Ok, so I am a judger and obviously, a stereotyper! When someone says, Utah, I automatically think of Mormons…men with many wives and lots & lots of kids.  Am I wrong?  I am thinking, good grief, with all those Mormons, having all those kids, being the religious fanatics that they are painted to be, how in the world could these people NOT be expelling babies through the government’s loins?  Maybe I was wrong!  Maybe they don’t have tons of kids, perhaps per headcount, they are low in the birth rate statistics.   Nope, I wasn’t wrong…shocking I know!  According to the “Business Insider” and their collected information from the CDC; “In raw numbers, of course, most babies are born each year in the most populous states: California, Texas, New York, and Florida. But when adjusted by population, the rate of births is the highest in Utah, with 17.6 births per 1,000 people — significantly higher than the national rate of 12.5.”  

I guess what happens in Utah, stays in Utah!  Does anyone else find this revelation slightly interesting?  Of all the states, with the exclusion of New Hampshire (they don’t really count, except for primaries) the one with the most moral convictions, the most children born each year has the lowest rate of welfare babies?  And then, to conceive a question; why are there 3 states that border Utah that has well over 50% of their babies pushed from the womb into the hands of Uncle Sam?  We all know there is an obvious reason for this, but no one really wants to admit it…Adios, my friends, have a great day! 

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and the featured writer.

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

 

Hiding in Plain Sight! The Conquest of Cultures.

January 30, 2017

This picture is a tent city in Saudi Arabia. It is there to rent out luxury tents to those traveling to Mecca…a stopover site. These tents rent for $500 and are top of the line, luxury. They sit vacant for the rest of the year!

One reporter (Brooke Binkowski) writes, ” As Mina is a traditional rest site during a holy pilgrimage, it is not likely that any refugees would be placed there, even if Saudi Arabia completely opened their borders to them. It is also uncertain whether Syrians would prefer to enter Saudi Arabia on refugee visas, and if so, whether they would be comfortable sleeping in tents that are intended for pilgrims — even if they are air-conditioned ones.”

Comfortable? WTH? You’ve got to be kidding me. So the Saudi Muslims won’t take their brothers and sisters during a “persecution”? Come on people! Obviously, they won’t let a good crisis go to waste when they can help spread Islam to the rest of the world! Is this agenda only blatantly obvious to a few of us? Saudi could care less about what the world thinks about them…they are doing their job by forcing the rest of the world to Islamify. How ignorant do you need to be to not see this? Saudi doesn’t care if they look like the bad guy. They are not taking refugees because they are on a mission. This is NOT paranoia, fear-mongering or xenophobia…this is exactly what they have been telling the world they are doing! Saudi’s involvement in 9/11 was just the beginning. If you haven’t been listening, or perhaps simply not paying attention, here are just a few statements of how the Islamic, “extremist” plan to execute their call to action:

“Top Iman Sheikh Muhammad Ayed recently gave a speech in which he asserted that Muslims should use the migrant crisis to breed with European citizens and “conquer their countries”. “We will give them fertility! We will breed children with them, because we shall conquer their countries!” Ayed stated that “whether you like it or not,” Americans, Italians, Germans and the French will be forced to take the “refugees”. “To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act,”

“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”– Houari (Mohamed) Boumedienne, President of Algeria, 1965 – 1978, in a 1974 speech at the UN

“There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without swords, without guns, without conquest. we don’t need terrorists, we don’t need homicide bombers. The 50+ million Muslims [in Europe] will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”− Muammar Gaddafi, Supreme Leader of Libya

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran . . . should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”− Ohmar Ahmad, co-founder of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) “Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world.”− Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran’s Supreme Leader from 1979 to 1989, the highest-ranking political and religious authority of the nation.

“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future. But I’m not going to do anything violent to promote that. I’m going to do it through education.”− Ibrahim Hooper, Communications Director, CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations)

“The whole of Europe will become Islamic. Like the army of the sultan we will conquer Rome.”− Former Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan, June 2002

“It is a duty incumbent on every Muslim to struggle towards the aim of making every people Muslim and the whole world Islamic, so that the banner of Islam can flutter over the earth and the call of the Muezzin can resound in all the corners of the world: God is greatest [Allahu akbar]!”- Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.

This has all been very methodically, thought out and carried out. You take a crisis, like a few countries in the Middle East fighting…now that is not a stretch for any one’s imagination as these people have been fighting with each other since the beginning of time. Factor in the civilized world’s need for compassion, to help the poor people that are being persecuted and displaced by this “war” and you have a bedroom suite built for propagating. Now, I know these people are really fighting and I know that people are actually dying, but as we have seen in our own country how easy it is to pit one group against another and get the desired results. We here in America are experiencing our own little civil war…one that also is being well orchestrated for a purpose and an agenda. This is the first time in my entire life that the enemy has spelled out their intent, from start to finish. They are not keeping secrets about what they intend to do and have made it so clear that they are using this so-called, “refugee crisis” to establish their conquest. Is anyone listening? They are certainly deaf in Europe!  https://youtu.be/aYDfACr-y4s

These are not crackpots to the Islamic Religion, this man (Sheik Ali Al Faqir–Former Jordanian Minister of Religous Endowment) is a well-respected Scholar, an Iman. Who is listening? Open your ears, they are making speaking so loudly as to what they intend to do. Go into other countries, marry the native woman, have children….lots of children and spread Islam without actually having to conquer the country with the sword. They are transparent but very few are paying attention. As it is, most of Europe is now lost. It may not seem so at this point, but just wait 20 years. If you think the riots after Trump’s inauguration were bad, just wait! Most of the people who are rioting were about 16 years old when Obama became the US President. In 8 short years, they were indoctrinated, (well-thought-out process) into a Socialist doctrine. Sadly people are just plain ignorant of history. They protest in ignorance, riot with breathless exhilaration and blindly follow a narrative they have been fed with not so much as a burp. They are agnostic to the fact that Jimmy Carter closed our borders to Iranian Nationals, deported thousands of students during the Hostage Crisis, that Bill Clinton had very strong words regarding protecting our borders and immigration in his 1995 State of the Union Address, and the Obama administration has deported more people than any other President! Where were the protests? Where was the outrage? There wasn’t any because Obama did all this in secret! Whereas President Trump is letting the American people know exactly what is he doing and why.

The bottom line with all of this, is that there is a rather large group, of well-organized people; call them Religious Zealots, Islamic Terrorists, call them whatever you want, the fact still remains that this group has every intention of making good on their threats and they are counting on the fact that the people of Europe and the people of the United States hold firmly to their humanitarian ethics and become divided over this issue….with national division comes disorganization, with diversity comes division…when unity is lost, so is a country lost to its culture and overtaken by its population.

 

 

Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and the featured writer.

 

 

 

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.

 

 

 

 

HOW TO TRUMP THE GLOBAL CHIMNEY? STOKE IT!

January 20, 2017

There has been a lot of “news” steaming up my facebook feed lately.  It is hard to keep up with all the vastly differing opinions on any particular subject and which, “expert” actually knows what he/she is talking about.  I have found, depending upon their politics and who is actually funding the research the “facts” directly correlate to the party line; just like an expert witness in a court case…their paid testimony can make or break the case.  And, most of the time, each side has its own, “expert witness” bought and paid to sway the jury.  Such is the case, with the Global Warming alarmists.  I think we all knew that there was no way we were going to get through this election and past the Inauguration without the doom and gloom, man-made global warmers heating things up.  After all, it was President Obama who claimed that Climate Change was more dangerous than ISIS; “I’m more worried about climate change than ISIS!”  Hmmm, well ok… perhaps he was speaking for himself personally and not the country in general. Which brings me to a few environmental stories that have made the rounds lately.

The first one that caught my attention last week, was regarding volcanos and their negligent effect on global warming, climate change, etc.  For decades it had been scientifically accepted that the gasses, debris, pollution, and heat emitted from volcanos, especially Super Volcanos erupting, had a profound effect on the environment.  A simple internet search, 10 years ago would prove this.  However, it seems that the scientists were just doing the math wrong and have found that volcanos are not as harmful to the planet as man-made, gasses, debris, pollution and heat, which we all know causes Global warming AND Climate Change!  Now a simple google search shows that the data was wrong and volcano’s put out a “sustainable” amount of emissions.  Ummm, anyone out there remember Mount St. Hellens?  I wonder how quickly the “facts” would change if three major volcanos erupted at the same time.  Take Krakatoa for instance, which was the largest recorded volcanic eruption in 1883.  So violent was this eruption that global temperatures were on the chilly side all around the globe due to the massive amounts of reflective volcanic aerosols that were ejected into the atmosphere.  Ironically, the lack of the sun’s ray also affected the ocean’s water temperature…no kidding, without the warmth of the sun, the oceans cooled and continued to stay cool for almost a century!  Weird right.  I read one scientific report that said if it hadn’t been for Krakatoa erupting we would be seeing our current, “global warming” intensified and perhaps at a critical point of us spontaneously combusting.  The spontaneously combusting part was mine.  Well, thank God, for natural disasters to stave off man’s desire to kill our planet with man-made Global Warming! 

So this brings me to the important news of the day.  “Earth Sets a Temperature Record for the Third Straight Year”  New York Times (01/19/2017)  Inspired as I was, while looking at the 3 feet of melting snow in my yard, I read the entire article!  Low and behold, in the second paragraph, “Trump”.  Obviously, Trump hates people and wants us all to burn in a global catastrophe after the earth floods and floats all of the ISIS armies to our shores!  Remember it IS Global warming that created ISIS!  It’s really damn hot in the Middle East ya know!  So back to the article…evidently, the earth has gotten hotter, and for the past 3 years, each year slightly hotter than the next.  After the Anti-Trump paragraph, the next was a mixture of undisputed scientific “facts” and the “profound threat” this warming will have on the “civilization” of the entire world!!!  We are all going to die…unless we live, and that is an undisputed fact!  Then the next paragraph stated this:  “In 2015 and 2016, the planetary warming was intensified by the weather pattern known as El Niño, in which the Pacific Ocean released a huge burst of energy and water vapor into the atmosphere. But the bigger factor in setting the records was the long-term trend of rising temperatures, which scientists say is being driven by increasing levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses.”    Wait a minute!  Did Trump create this YUGE burst of energy in the Pacific Ocean, or was it the Russians? Although the article did mention China.  It must be man-made!  Let’s look into this…and the rabbit trail begins.

 

At the very beginning of the rabbit hole, I stumble on a fault, (through no fault of my own–not man-made) literally a Pacific underwater fault! “Massive amounts of heat pulsing from the earth!”  Geologist, James Edward Kamis.  By the way, Kamis is/was a strong propagator of the Man-Made Global warming theory.  On Oct. 12, 2015, some scientists noticed that a hole had been created in the sea ice directly above a fault line in the Gakkel Ridge Rift / Fault System.    

The Gakkel ridge is a gigantic chain of underwater volcanoes snaking 1,800 kilometers (1,100 miles) beneath the Arctic Ocean from the northern tip of Greenland to Siberia. So, a big hole was punched out of the ice due to systemic activity (tectonic plates moving and volcanos erupting).  All of this super-charged heat and gasses broke through the ice and flew right into heavens.  Hold the phone…VOLCANOS?  This wasn’t on the news so it certainly can’t be true!  Oh, it gets better! 

Let’s wander over to Guam and learn something about heating, venting and cooling—HVAC to the layman.  A few years ago, a group of scientists started focusing their attention to the waters near Guam and discovered a natural phenomenon called the “Global Chimney”.  According to an article by the Scientific American, By Kevin Schultz, July 17, 2014 (Giant Global “Chimney” Could Alter Climate Change. Understanding how ocean gases are pumped into the upper atmosphere could help predict and even regulate our future world environment) this chimney thing seems to cause havoc on our global environment.  So now I want to know more about this recently discovered “Global Chimney”   “A sparsely populated part of the western tropical Pacific Ocean, known as the “global chimney,” boasts the world’s warmest ocean temperatures and vents massive volumes of warm gases from the surface high into the atmosphere, which may shape global climate and air chemistry enough to impact billions of people worldwide..”  Credit: Rebecca Hornbrook  

What are scientists saying about this “Giant Chimney”  and why haven’t I heard about this if it can affect “Billions” of people in the world?  “There are a lot of consequences from this type of air motion,” says Elliot Atlas, professor of marine and atmospheric chemistry at the University of Miami and a principal investigator for the project. “There is a link between the chemistry that goes on in this type of air motion and the subsequent effects on the trace gasses and aerosols in the atmosphere that ultimately impact climate.”   Here is a rendering of this global chimney: (Artist Credit to NCAR)

We have many gasses in our atmosphere, such as, chlorofluorocarbons (bad), and bromine compounds (bad), which are mostly man-made and can hang out in the stratosphere for years.  However, bromine a compound generally found in fire extinguishers, which is much more reactive than chlorofluorocarbons, is also produced in large quantities in nature.  I just read all about Bromine and my head is full, I suggest you fill your head as well.  I did discover, however, that this element is found mostly in saltwater, (um, like the many vast oceans around the world) and in the earth’s crust as well as in decaying things.  “Natural salt deposits and brines are the main sources of bromine and its compounds. Jordan, Israel, and China led the world in bromine production in the early 21st century;”   Ah HA!  The New York Times was right, Trump and China are causing global warming which is creating climate change!  How did I not put 2 and 2 together?  Alright, back to the chimney.  Just like in your house fireplace, the chimney vents not only the gasses and heat from your fire, it is not discriminatory, it will certainly suck all the heat from your home, like a huge vacuum right into the outside world. I tell my kids all the time, “shut the fireplace doors, that’s money going up the chimney!”  The same thing has been RECENTLY discovered with this Global Chimney in this area of the Pacific Ocean and, “The planet’s climate ultimately becomes altered when these gasses (natural) start to affect the amount of energy from the sun that is allowed to reach Earth’s surface or is stored in the atmosphere. Besides increasing or decreasing the levels of ozone in the upper atmosphere, some of the chemicals also contribute directly to the greenhouse effect. For example, added water vapor pumped into the upper atmosphere from the chimney increases the amount of energy trapped there, in turn heating the planet further.”  I added the word, NATURAL into this quote, because we really shouldn’t have confusion here with regards to the earth’s natural emissions from underwater faults spewing gasses and underwater volcanoes erupting, as well as the effects of decay,  that gets sucked into this global chimney and pushed into our upper atmosphere.  There has also been a much smaller chimney discovered in the Asian monsoon circulation, which is predominate in the summer season and creates a path from the lower atmosphere to the higher stratosphere.  Remember, these NATURAL emissions are considered to affect Billions of people and are just now being studied.  Ross Salawitch, a University of Maryland, College Park, professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences states,  “And although the collection process is now over, the scientists have a lot of data to sift through before they can say for sure what exactly is happening in this chimney and what its future impact on the world’s climate could be. “The data collected during these missions will stand as benchmarks for testing how well the tropics are represented in computer simulations and in forecasts of future climate,”  Well, ok then..about 5 years of data collection should show a LOT (insert sarcasm font here) regarding how much these underwater volcanoes, faults, decaying ocean life, and salt are actually affecting the climate.  I thought that we already knew this…but alas we are well informed! Google searches result in the assertion that Global Warming and Climate change are mostly man-made and have very little to do with volcanos?  Ahhh, must be the changing tide of science, tossed to and fro.  After all, according to Al Gore, the North Pole would be ice-free by now, which it’s NOT!  In January 2006, Al Gore posited “within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return” and “a true planetary emergency” due to global warming.”  PLANETARY EMERGENCY!  Now that was scary!  Guess we dodged that bullet.

What I have learned by my own personal research today, is that we have some superheated, chemically charged water, caused by underwater seismic activity, that happens every once and a while causing the phenomena we know as El Nino.  From everything I have researched, nowhere did I find humans lighting these underwater volcanos on fire, or that offshore drilling was causing the earth’s plates to move.  So, El Nino heats and La Nina cools…what are they trying to convey here with those gender-specific names anyway?  Even, Kamis states, “Even though the October 12 event was associated with an extensive earthquake swarm, a huge methane release, and a significant series of volcanic eruptions along the Gakkel Ridge, it was, and still is dismissed as insignificant by most climate scientists advocating the theory of man-made global warming,”   As I write this, there is just no denying climate change (we see what you did there scientists) as last week we saw record snowfalls, sub-zero temperatures and now it is 37 degrees and the snow is melting causing lots of water on the roads.  Moreover, this winter Jerusalem saw heavy snowfall for the first time in four years and that means the tensions caused by the heat should calm the Middle East down for a while…right?  So who can deny Climate Change?  It’s been changing forever and will continue with this pattern.

Please do not misunderstand why I felt the need to compose this.  I firmly believe that we are stewards of the earth and are responsible to keep it healthy.  However, I also know that people can be easily controlled, agendas fulfilled and money made when a man-made crisis is created.  People tend to be gullible, intellectually lazy and have the propensity to buy into whatever is pandered to them.  I think I will forward this blog entry to Dom Tullipso (pronounced, “too-YEEP-so” because the L’s are silent) to get his views on the subject.

But for now, it seems that we should focus our hysteria and fears on things that we can not control, like that friggen, YUGE, “Global Chimney!” that is sucking the life out of us!   Oh wait, never mind, no money to be made there…”it’s all going right up the chimney!”

 

(Daniella Cross is the Guardian of 4Earth and a featured writer.)

ALL images used in this site rely on the U.S. Copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use” with No Copyright Infringement intended.